ISSN 1392-0138
ISSN 2029-4174 (online)
|
2009 m. Nr. 1-2
Factors influencing local tumour progression after radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver tumours
Mantas TRAKYMAS, Albertas ULYS, Edita MIŠEIKYTĖ KAUBRIENĖ
Introduction. Local tumour progression remains the main problem after radiofrequency
ablation of liver tumours and is usually the only factor of treatment efficacy. The aim of our
study was to assess factors predicting local tumour progression after radiofrequency ablation
of malignant hepatic tumours that could be evaluated before intervention.
Materials and methods. We have studied 68 malignant primary and metastatic hepatic
tumours treated by radiofrequency ablation. Ablation was performed using perfusion
electrodes. Evaluation of tumours before ablation and during the follow-up was performed
by means of contrast enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography. Tumour type,
size, echogenicity, density, enhancement pattern and proximity to large hepatic vessels
closer than 5 mm were analysed as risk factors for local tumour progression. Local tumour
progression was assessed by follow-up CT scans and ultrasonography. The Nelson–Aalen
cumulative risk estimation method and log rank test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: 58 successfully treated hepatic tumours were suitable for the final analysis.
The local progression of nine (15.5%) tumours was detected in the follow-up. The mean
follow-up time for the tumours was 16.3 months, range 1.7 to 38.7 months. The size of the
tumour more than 30 mm in diameter and its proximity closer than 5 mm to large hepatic
vessels were identified as risk factors for local tumour progression after radiofrequency
ablation. Tumour type, echogenicity, density and enhancement pattern had no significant
influence.
Conclusions. The size of the tumour and its proximity to hepatic vessels closer than
5 mm should be taken into consideration when performing radiofrequency ablation of
liver tumours and during the follow-up.
Keywords: radiofrequency ablation, hepatic tumours, local tumour progression, risk factors
|
Issues:
2011 - Vol.18 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42010 - Vol.17 No. 1-2, No. 3-42009 - Vol.16 No. 1-2, No. 3-42008 - Vol.15 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42007 - Vol.14 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42006 - Vol.13 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42005 - Vol.12 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42004 - Vol.11 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42003 - Vol.10 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42002 - Vol.9 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 42001 - Vol.8 No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4 |