Lietuvos mokslų akademijos Leidybos skyrius
    Tel. +370 5 2626851, +370 5 2613620 El. paštas leidyba@lma.lt
Biologija / Biology

ISSN 1392-0146
ISSN 2029-0578 (online)

2008 m. Nr. 2

Drought tolerance of turfgrass genetic resources
J. KANAPECKAS, N. LEMEŽIENĖ, V. STUKONIS, P. TARAKANOVAS

Field trials were carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture in 2006. The tests involved 120 genotypes of 9 major grass species bred for turf in Lithuania: Festuca rubra L. (subsp. commutata and subsp. rubra) and Festuca ovina L., Poa L. and Poa compressa L., Agrostis capillaris L., Lolium perenne L., Koeleria glauca DC and Deschampsia caespitosa Beauv. A large part of the genetic resources were collected in various natural habitats of Lithuania and other countries (Latvia and Estonia).

The aim of this work was to estimate drought susceptibility of turfgrass species and genotypes.

Experimental findings suggest that drought has a severe adverse effect on the quality of all the turfgrass species tested. After 75 days of drought, the ornamentality of various turfgrass species declined by 58.9% (Festuca ovina) to 83.3% (Deschampsia caespitosa). According to drought resistance, the test species can be ranked in the following sequence: Festuca ovina > Lolium perenne = Poa compressa > Poa pratensis = Koeleria glauca > Festuca rubra subsp. Rubra > Festuca rubra subsp. Commutata > Agrostis capillaris > Deschampsia caespitosa.

During the test period, drought resistance of individual varieties or breeding lines was revealed. The most resistant genotypes were identified within each species.

Keywords: drought, ornamentality, tolerance, turfgrass

Issues:

2011 - Vol.57
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3

2010 - Vol.56
No. 1-4

2009 - Vol.55
No. 1-2, No. 3-4

2008 - Vol.54
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2007 - Vol.53
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2006
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2005
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2004
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2003
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2002
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

2001
No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4